Russians' attitude towards entrepreneurship at the beginning of the XXI century: main trends

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅存取

详细

The article is based on the data of the long-term monitoring by the Institute of Sociology of RAS for the past 25 years to analyze the dynamic assessments by Russia’s population of entrepreneurship and involvement in entrepreneurial activity. The study shows that, first, there is a certain part of adults who are engaged in entrepreneurship, albeit there share in the population is not significantly changing over time and fluctuated in different years within 2 to 6%. Second, the entrepreneurial activity is hindered by various barriers, which vary at that depending on administrative restrictions (over 40% of Russians mention them), the stage of a person’s life cycle and the place of his/her residence. Third, the ideal socio-economic model in the mass consciousness implies a high degree of state involvement in the economy and its acceptance has doubled over the past 20 years (from 18.2% in 2001 to 36.8% in 2019). This economic model which not only limits the opportunities for the development of entrepreneurship, but also assigns it a deliberately secondary role. Thus, although Russians do not completely reject entrepreneurship as a legitimate form of economic activity, it should play a niche role. Entrepreneurship seems at that to be more attractive for young people and people with higher education, as well as for the two capitals inhabitants. In Russia, differences in the level of involvement in entrepreneurship and perception of this socio-economic phenomenon depending on human capital (age, education), as well as on the type of settlement, although decreasing over time, are still present. Entrepreneurship is often a realm for the younger and more educated people. It evokes a more positive attitude among residents of Moscow and St. Petersburg. The older and the lower the level of education, the lower the level of respondents’ involvement in entrepreneurship, the higher the level of rejecting entrepreneurship and phenomena closely related to its development – market economy and competition. With some exaggeration, it can be said that the attitude to entrepreneurship, like a litmus test, allows to distinguish two Russias. The first is the Russia of metropolitan centers, educated and younger people. The second is the Russia of an older and less educated population living on the periphery of the country. In Russia today, two opposite trends can be distinguished, which in the long run might affect the level of entrepreneurial activity and the perception of this phenomenon by the mass consciousness. On the one hand, these are demographic processes, as well as digitalization and related socio-economic processes (emergence of platform economy, the introduction of AI in business processes, etc.) objectively contributing to the formation of a hybrid type of worker-entrepreneur-self-employee and make entrepreneurship an everyday reality for growing parts of the population. On the other hand, the processes of re-nationalization of the economy, restrictions on the freedom of private property objectively narrow opportunities for entrepreneurial initiative and marginalize this phenomenon.

全文:

受限制的访问

作者简介

Alexander Chepurenko

Institute of Sociology of FCTAS RAS

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: achepurenko@hse.ru

Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Professor

俄罗斯联邦, Moscow

Nina Kolennikova

Institute of Sociology of FCTAS RAS

Email: kolennikova-nina@mail.ru

Cand. Sci. (Sociol.), Senior Research Fellow

俄罗斯联邦, Moscow

参考

  1. Aganbegyan A. G. (2023) Social and Economic Development of Russia. Ups and Downs. Opportunities and Prospects. Srednerusskij vestnik obshchestvennyh nauk [Central Russian Journal of Social Sciences]. Vol. 18. No. 6: 14–46. (In Russ.)
  2. Aganbegyan A. G. (2021) Reflections on the Analytical Report “Stagnation 2: Consequences, Risks and Alternatives for the Russian Economy”. Economicheskaya politika [Economic Policy]. Vol. 16. No. 4: 198–215. (In Russ.)
  3. Agénor P. R. (2017) Caught in the Middle? The Economics of Middle-Income Traps. Journal of Economic Surveys. Vol. 31. No. 3: 771–791.
  4. Aidis R., Estrin S., Mickiewicz T. (2008) Institutions and Entrepreneurship Development in Russia: A Comparative Perspective. Journal of Business Venturing. Vol. 23. No. 6: 656–672.
  5. Alaberdeev R. R., Latov Y. V. (2010) Financial Pyramids as a Form of Non-Productive Entrepreneurship. Terra Economicus. Vol. 8. No. 2: 35–43. (In Russ.)
  6. Arenius P., Minniti M. (2005) Perceptual Variables and Nascent Entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics. Vol. 24: 233–247.
  7. Barinova V. A., Zemtsov S. P., Mikhaylov A. A., Tsareva Yu.V. (2022) Reconsidering Long-term Trends in the Development of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in Russia and the Regions in the post-Soviet Period. Ekonomicheskoe razvitie Rossii [Russian Economic Development]. Vol. 29. No. 7: 29–44. (In Russ.)
  8. Barsukova S.Yu., Radaev V. V. (2012) Informal Economy in Russia: A Brief Overview. Economicheskaya Sotsiologiya [Journal of Economic Sociology]. Vol. 13. No. 2: 99–111. (In Russ.)
  9. Bilić I., Škokić V., Lovrinčević M. (2021) Academic Entrepreneurship in Post-transition Country – Case Study of Croatia. Journal of the Knowledge Economy. Vol. 12. No. 1: 41–55.
  10. Bogatyreva K. A. (2024) Opportunity Perception as A Missing Link: Adjustment of the Theory of Planned Behavior to Entrepreneurial Process. Rossijskij zhurnal menedzhmenta [Russian Management Journal]. Vol. 22. No. 1: 5–28. (In Russ.)
  11. Chepurenko A.Yu. (2019) Flexible Organisational Structure and Typology of the Informal Small Enterpreneurship in Russia. Economicheskaya Sotsiologiya [Journal of Economic Sociology]. Vol. 20. No. 4: 39–69. (In Russ.)
  12. Chepurenko A.Yu. (2011) Entrepreneurship and SME Policies in Fragile Environments: the Example of Russia. In: Handbook of research on entrepreneurship policies in Central and Eastern Europe. Ed. by F. Welter, D. Smallbone. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing: 190–209.
  13. Chepurenko A.Yu., Butryumova N. N., Chernysheva M. V., Sutormina A. Y. (2024) Entrepreneurship in and Around Academia: Evidence from Russia. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy. Vol. 44. No. 1/2: 130–154.
  14. Chepurenko A.Yu., Sutormina A. E. (2024) Entrepreneurial University in Russia: a Reassembling? Obshchestvo i ekonomika [Society and Economy]. No. 4: 82–107. (In Russ.)
  15. Chernykh S. I. (2021) State Capitalism in Russia: Theory, Practice and Modern Trends. Obshchestvo i ekonomika [Society and Economy]. No. 2: 5–17. (In Russ.)
  16. Dudin I. V. (2024) Attitude of the Population Toward the Main Social Contradictions of the Russiam Society: State, Dynamics, Factors. Sotsiologicheskiy zhurnal [Sociologic Journal]. No. 1: 90–112. (In Russ.)
  17. Farrell A., Mapanga W., Chitha N., Ashton J., Joffe M. (2022) Characteristics, Enablers and Barriers Affecting Entrepreneurial Behaviour for Academics in Low-And Middle-Income Countries: A Scoping Review. Development Southern Africa. Vol. 39. No. 4: 589–603.
  18. Hanson P., Teague E. (2007) Russian Political Capitalism and its Environment. In: Varieties of Capitalism in Post-Communist Countries. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK: 149–164.
  19. Konovalova M. E., Fomin E. P. (2018) On the Question of the Role of Small Business in the Conditions of Digitalization of the Economy. Ekonomicheskie nauki [Economic Sciences]. Vol. 168. No. 11: 26–28. (In Russ.)
  20. Kordonsky S. G. (2010) Estate Structure of Post-Soviet Russia. Mir Rossii [Universe of Russia]. Vol. 17. No. 3: 37–66.
  21. Kostin G. A., Uporova I. V. (2018) Transformation of Entrepreneurship under the Influence of the Digital Economy. Ekonomika i upravlenie [Economics and Management]. Vol. 158. No. 12: 51–60. (In Russ.)
  22. Martianov V. S. (2016) Social Stratification of Modern Societies: from Economic Classes to Rental Groups? Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 10: 139–148.
  23. Nureev R. M., Latov Yu.V. (2015) Institutional Development in Post-Soviet Russia: in Search for an Escape from the Path-dependence of ‘Power-Ownership’. Mir Rossii [Universe of Russia]. Vol. 24. No. 2: 50– 88. (In Russ.)
  24. Obraztsova O. I., Chepurenko A.Yu. (2020) SME Policy in the Russian Federation: Renewal after the Pandemic? Voprosy gosudarstvennogo i municipal’nogo upravleniya [Public Administration Issues]. No. 3: 71–95. (In Russ.)
  25. Orekhovsky P. A. (2020) Middle Income Trap: Institutional and Cognitive Foundations. Zhurnal institucional’nyh issledovanij [Journal of Institutional Studies]. Vol. 12. No. 2: 38–49. (In Russ.)
  26. Platform Employment in Russia: Scale, Motives and Barriers to Participation. (2022) Ed. by S. S. Biryukova. Moscow: NRU HSE. (In Russ.)
  27. Pokida A. N., Zybunovskaya N. V. (2024) Entrepreneurship in the Focus of Public Opinion. Vlast’ [The Authority]. Vol. 32. No. 4: 193–202. (In Russ.)
  28. Property and Business Life and the Perception of Russians. (2006) Ed. by M. K. Gorshkov, N. E. Tikhonova, A.Yu. Chepurenko. Moscow: Nauka. (In Russ.)
  29. Rimashevskaya N. M. (2004) Quality of Human Potential in Today’s Russia. Bezopasnost’ Evrasii [Eurasia Security]. No. 1: 21–37. (In Russ.)
  30. Shane S., Venkataraman S. (2000) The Promise of Entrepreneurship as a Field of Research. Academy of Management Review. Vol. 25. No. 1: 217–226.
  31. Structural Modernization of the Russian Economy: Conditions, Directions, Mechanisms. (2022) Ed. by E. B. Lenchuk, N. Y. Akhapkin, V. I. Filatov. St. Petersburg: Aletheia. (In Russ.)
  32. Szerb L., Trumbull W. N. (2018) Entrepreneurship Development in Russia: is Russia a Normal Country? An Empirical Analysis. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development. No. 25: 902–929.
  33. Toshchenko Zh.T. (2011) Centaur-Ideas as Deformation of Public Consciousness. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 12: 3–13. (In Russ.)
  34. Volkov V. V. (2005) Violent Entrepreneurship. Economic and Sociological Analysis. Moscow: Izdatel’skij dom GU VShE. (In Russ.)
  35. Yakovlev A. A. (2010) State Capitalism, Corruption and Effectiveness of State Machinery. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost [Social Sciences and Modernity]. No. 4: 18–25. (In Russ.)
  36. Yakovlev A. A., Golikova V. V., Kapralova N. L. (2007) Russian “Chelnoki”: From Willy-Nilly Entrepreneurs to Integration with Market Economy. Mir Rossii [Universe of Russia]. Vol. 16. No. 2: 84–106. (In Russ.)
  37. Zemtsov S. P. (2022) Technological Entrepreneurship as a Development Factor of Russia. Zhurnal Novoj ekonomicheskoj associacii [Journal of the New Economic Association]. Vol. 53. No. 1: 212–223.
  38. Zemtsov S. P., Smelov Y. A. (2018) Factors of Regional Development in Russia: Geography, Human, Capital and Regional Policies. Zhurnal Novoj ekonomicheskoj associacii [Journal of the New Economic Association]. Vol. 40. No. 4: 84–108. (In Russ.)
  39. Zubarevich N. V. (2012) Social Differentiation of Regions and Cities. Pro et Contra. Vol. 16. No. 4–5: 135– 152. (In Russ.)

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Dynamics of responses to the question of whether the respondent has achieved what he wants in such a sphere of life as owning his own business, 2001-2024, in % Note. The sample sizes were 1,736 in 2001, 1,750 in 2005, 2008, 2009, and 2010, 1,751 in 2006 and 2012, 1,741 in 2011, 4,000 in 2015 and 2018, and 2,000 in 2020 and 2024.

下载 (171KB)
3. Fig. 2. Opinions of Russians when answering the question: "What are the main reasons that few people in Russia are engaged in entrepreneurial activity?", 2019, in % Note. Any number of responses was allowed (N = 2000).

下载 (195KB)
4. Figure 3. Dynamics of the share of respondents who chose the most acute contradictions between which groups of Russian society, the options "between business owners and employees" (solid line) and "between oligarchs and the rest of society" (dotted line), 2005-2024. ,%

下载 (67KB)

版权所有 © Russian Academy of Sciences, 2025