Man and society – through the prism of artificial intelligence

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅存取

详细

Prospects for the introduction of artificial intelligence technologies are discussed through the prism of human and societal imperfection. It is emphasized that artificial intelligence should be considered an essential reason for a kind of full-fledged self-audit by civilization and personality. The reasons for the pessimistic attitude to the possibilities of qualitative social transformations are evaluated, despite the vivid developments in the field of artificial intelligence. Fears of artificial intelligence reveal absurdity of many “basic” mechanisms of society’s existence up to now, including the standard ideas about prime importance of mercantile values. It is stated that there is a constant slip in the use of all without exception overtechnologies with maximum public benefit. Attention is focused on the expediency to implement a social revolution in its personally transformative dimension. At the same time it is noted that human improvement projects are almost unambiguously met with anxiety, distrust and reasonable skepticism.

全文:

受限制的访问

作者简介

Andrei Yakovenko

Lugansk State University named after Vladimir Dahl

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: 6daoav@rambler.ru

Dr. Sci. (Sociol.), Prof., Lugansk State University named after Vladimir Dahl, Lugansk, Head of the Department

俄罗斯联邦, Lugansk

参考

  1. Barkhatova L. A. (2023) From virtual to digital research: methodological promises and limitations of approaches. Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 1: 62–70. doi: 10.31857/S013216250020183-4. (In Russ.)
  2. Baudrillard J. (2021) The Consumer Society. Moscow: AST. (In Russ.)
  3. Biyzhanova E. K. (2023) Universal basic income as a tool to combat inequality in modern russia Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 7: 154–158. doi: 10.31857/S013216250026594-6. (In Russ.)
  4. Fromm E. (2019) The Sane Society. Moscow: AST. (In Russ.)
  5. Ivanov D. V., Asochakov Yu.V. (2023) Digitalization and critical theory of society. Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 6: 16–28. doi: 10.31857/S013216250024389-0. (In Russ.)
  6. Kravchenko S. A. (2021) Sociology of digitalization. Moscow: Urait. (In Russ.)
  7. Rомаnоvsкiy N. V. (2022) Humans. society. sоciоlоgy (reflecting on a monograph by I. V. Katerny). Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 8: 161–166. doi: 10.31857/S013216250021063-2. (In Russ.)
  8. Smirnova A. S. (2023) Аbout the problems of digital inequality during the pandemic. Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 1: 157–158. doi: 10.31857/S013216250023440-7. (In Russ.)
  9. Sorokin P. (2006) Social and Cultural Dynamics. Moscow: AST. (In Russ.)
  10. Toshchenko Zh.T. (2001) The paradox man. Moscow: Gardariki. (In Russ.)

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML

版权所有 © Russian Academy of Sciences, 2024