Types of immune responses and characteristics of the platelet hemostasis system in patients with myocardial infarction–associated cardiogenic shock: a cohort study

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Myocardial infarction–associated cardiogenic shock (MI-CS) remains a condition with high mortality despite advances in reperfusion therapy. In recent years, increasing attention has been paid to the role of systemic inflammation and immunothrombosis in its pathogenesis.

AIM: This work aimed to assess the types of immune responses and the functional state of the platelet hemostatic system in patients with MI-CS and to analyze their association with clinical outcomes.

METHODS: This pilot cohort study included 24 patients with MI-CS. The type of immune response was determined based on leukocyte and lymphocyte counts, and platelet functional activity was assessed using low-frequency piezothromboelastography. Statistical analysis included nonparametric tests, multivariable logistic regression, and Kaplan–Meier survival analysis.

RESULTS: The mortality rate was 20.8% (n = 5). Activation of innate immunity predominated in 52.6% of survivors, whereas activation of adaptive immunity was observed in 80% of nonsurvivors (p = 0.048). In nonsurvivors, a trend toward shortening of the contact phase of coagulation was noted despite dual antiplatelet therapy. The lowest values of this parameter were recorded in cases with adaptive immune activation and immune areactivity.

CONCLUSION: Activation of adaptive immunity and platelet hyperactivation are associated with poor prognosis in MI-CS. Immunohematologic profiling may improve risk stratification and help optimize therapy.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Stanislav V. Dil

Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Science

Author for correspondence.
Email: dil.stanislav@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3692-5892
SPIN-code: 9345-3007
Russian Federation, Tomsk

Irina V. Kologrivova

Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Science

Email: kiv@cardio-tomsk.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4537-0008
SPIN-code: 6987-2021
Russian Federation, Tomsk

Maria A. Kercheva

Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Science; Siberian State Medical University

Email: mariiakercheva@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1444-1037
SPIN-code: 9641-2091
Russian Federation, Tomsk; Tomsk

Oleg O. Panteleev

Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Science; Siberian State Medical University

Email: panteleev.o.o@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5152-2106
SPIN-code: 1275-2140
Russian Federation, Tomsk; Tomsk

Vyacheslav V. Ryabov

Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Science; Siberian State Medical University

Email: rvvt@cardio-tomsk.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4358-7329
SPIN-code: 5230-4887

MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor

Russian Federation, Tomsk; Tomsk

References

  1. Laforgia PL, Auguadro C, Bronzato S, Durante A. The reduction of mortality in acute myocardial infarction: from bed rest to future directions. Int J Prev Med. 2022;13:56. doi: 10.4103/ijpvm.IJPVM_122_20 EDN: LGDAKV
  2. Dil S, Kercheva M, Belich N, et al. Stage a cardiogenic shock in the SCAI classification: limitations and prospects for diagnostic improvement. Cardiol Rev. 2025. doi: 10.1097/CRD.0000000000001027
  3. Borisov RN, Zdzitovetskii DE, Kasparov EV, et al. Types of immune system reactions and their characteristic in patients with generalized purulent peritonitis. Siberian medical review. 2019;(5(119)):80–87. doi: 10.20333/2500136-2019-5-80-87 EDN: VJLZSX
  4. Bykov VV, Vengerovskii AI, Udut VV. The relationship between inflammation and hemostasis disorders in cardiovascular and infectious diseases. Annals of the Russian academy of medical sciences. 2022;77(4):261–266. doi: 10.15690/vramn212 EDN: AGDJIH
  5. World medical association. World medical association declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013;310(20):2191–2194. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.281053
  6. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, et al; Executive group on behalf of the joint European society of cardiology (ESC)/American college of cardiology (ACC)/American heart association (AHA)/World heart federation (WHF) task force for the universal definition of myocardial infarction. Fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction (2018). Circulation. 2018;138(20):e618–e651. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000617 EDN: GWBEZQ
  7. Ibanez B, James S, Agewall S, et al; ESC scientific document group. 2017 ESC guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: the task force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European society of cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2018;39(2):119–177. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx393 EDN: XXODSH
  8. Baran DA, Grines CL, Bailey S, et al. SCAI clinical expert consensus statement on the classification of cardiogenic shock: this document was endorsed by the American college of cardiology (ACC), the American heart association (AHA), the Society of critical care medicine (SCCM), and the Society of thoracic surgeons (STS) in april 2019. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;94(1):29–37. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28329
  9. Coll MD, Yanamandala M, Ferro EG, et al. Early immunosuppression and rapid recovery of cardiogenic shock in multisystem inflammatory syndrome from convalescent COVID-19. JACC Case Rep. 2021;3(12):1403–1408. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccas.2021.06.045 EDN: UTSCOC
  10. Kruchinkina EV, Ogurkova ON, Gusakova AM, et al. Features of the course of acute decompensated ischemic heart failure and/or ongoing adverse left ventricular remodeling in patients with identified human herpes virus type 6. The Siberian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine. 2021;36(3):111–118. doi: 10.29001/2073-8552-2021-36-3-111-118 EDN: EWZZGT
  11. Serebryanaya NB, Shanin SN, Fomicheva EE, Yakutseni PP. Blood platelets as activators and regulators of inflammatory and immune reactions. Part 2. Thrombocytes as participants of immune reactions. Medical Immunology (Russia). 2019;21(1):9–20. doi: 10.15789/1563-0625-2019-1-9-20 EDN: YXRXTV
  12. Yan C, Wu H, Fang X, et al. Platelet, a key regulator of innate and adaptive immunity. Front Med. 2023;10:1074878. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1074878 EDN: LOOBXD
  13. Yan M, Wang Z, Qiu Z, et al. Platelet signaling in immune landscape: comprehensive mechanism and clinical therapy. Biomark Res. 2024;12(1):164. doi: 10.1186/s40364-024-00700-y EDN: YZXYRE
  14. Su M, Chen C, Li S, et al. Gasdermin D-dependent platelet pyroptosis exacerbates NET formation and inflammation in severe sepsis. Nat Cardiovasc Res. 2022;1(8):732–747. doi: 10.1038/s44161-022-00108-7 EDN: ZGYDOV
  15. Hinterleitner C, Strähle J, Malenke E, et al. Platelet PD-L1 reflects collective intratumoral PD-L1 expression and predicts immunotherapy response in non-small cell lung cancer. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):7005. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-27303-7 EDN: BBDCDF
  16. Nakamori Y, Park EJ, Shimaoka M. Immune deregulation in sepsis and septic shock: reversing immune paralysis by targeting PD-1/PD-L1 pathway. Front Immunol. 2021;11:624279. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.624279 EDN: KOYTGC
  17. Dil S, Kercheva M, Panteleev O, et al. Myocardial infarction-associated shock: a comprehensive analysis of phenotypes, SCAI classification, and outcome assessment. Medicina. 2025;61(1):103. doi: 10.3390/medicina61010103 EDN: PQFBAN

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Distribution of immune response types among survivors and nonsurvivors with myocardial infarction–associated cardiogenic shock.

Download (87KB)

Copyright (c) 2025 Dil S.V., Kologrivova I.V., Kercheva M.A., Panteleev O.O., Ryabov V.V.

License URL: https://eco-vector.com/for_authors.php#07