Striction-induced stresses in a magnetoactive elastomer

Мұқаба

Дәйексөз келтіру

Толық мәтін

Ашық рұқсат Ашық рұқсат
Рұқсат жабық Рұқсат берілді
Рұқсат жабық Тек жазылушылар үшін

Аннотация

The possibility to determine the magnetostriction coefficient a of a magnetoactive elastomer is theoretically demonstrated by way of simple isometric experiment, when the force is measured that emerges in result of application of a field in the direction along which the dimension of the sample is fixed. It is shown that the value of a may be found from analyzing the dependence of the force (or surface pression) on the aspect ratio of the sample.

Толық мәтін

Рұқсат жабық

Авторлар туралы

O. Stolbov

Institute of Continuous Media Mechanics, Perm Federal Research Center of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: raikher@icmm.ru
Ресей, Perm, 614018

Yu. Raikher

Institute of Continuous Media Mechanics, Perm Federal Research Center of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: raikher@icmm.ru
Ресей, Perm, 614018

Әдебиет тізімі

  1. Jolly M.R., Carlson J.D., Muñoz B.C. // Smart Mater. Struct. 1996. V. 5. P. 607.
  2. Davies L.C. // J. Appl. Phys. 1999. V. 85. P. 3348.
  3. Carlson J.D., Jolly M.R. // Mechatronics. 2000. V. 10. P. 555.
  4. Böse H., Gerlach N., Ehrlich J. // J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 2021. V. 32. Art. No. 1550.
  5. Yu K., Fang N.X., Huang G., Wang Q. // Adv. Mater. 2018. V. 30. Art. No. 1706348.
  6. Lloyd P., Hoshiar A.K., da Veiga T. et al. // IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 2020. V. 5. P. 3937.
  7. Bastola A.K., Hossain M. // Mater. Des. 2021. V. 211. Art. No. 110172.
  8. Fernandes M.M., Correia D.M., Ribeiro C. et al. // ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2019. V. 11. P. 45265.
  9. Тикадзуми С. Физика ферромагнетизма. Магнитные характеристики и практические применения. М.: Мир, 1987.
  10. Бозорт Р. Ферромагнетизм. М.: ГИФМЛ, 1956.
  11. Stolbov O.V., Raikher Yu.L., Balasoiu M. // Soft Matter. 2011. V. 8. P. 8484.
  12. Dorfmann A., Ogden R.W. // Europ. J. Mech. A. Solids. 2003. V. 22. P. 497.
  13. Kankanala S.V., Triantafyllidis N. // J. Mech. Phys. Solids. 2004. V. 52. P. 2869.
  14. Райхер Ю.Л., Столбов О.В. // Прикл. мех. и техн. физ. 2005. № 3. С. 153.
  15. Райхер Ю.Л., Столбов О.В. // Вычисл. мех. сплош. сред. 2009. Т. 2. С. 85.
  16. Morozov K., Shliomis M., Yamaguchi H. // Phys. Rev. E. 2009. V. 79. Art. No. 040801(R).
  17. Oswald P. Rheophysics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
  18. Zubarev A.Yu., Borin D.Yu. // J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2015. V. 377. P. 373.
  19. Raikher Yu.L., Stolbov O.V. // J. Phys. Cond. Matt. 2008. V. 20. Art. No. 204126.
  20. Shkel Yu.M., Klingenberg D.J. // J. Appl. Phys. 1998. V. 83. P. 7834.
  21. Romeis D., Kostrov S.A., Kramarenko E.Yu. et al. // Soft Matter. 2020. V. 16. P. 9047.
  22. Borin D.Yu., Odenbach S., Stepanov G.V. // J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2019. V. 470. P. 85.

Қосымша файлдар

Қосымша файлдар
Әрекет
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Scheme of isometric testing of the MAE sample.

Жүктеу (79KB)
3. Fig. 2. Dependence of the average pressure at the end of the cylinder on the aspect ratio for the values ​​of magnetic susceptibility χ0: 3.8 (1), 5.0 (2), 7.5 (3); magnetostriction parameter α = 0.

Жүктеу (67KB)
4. Fig. 3. Dependence of the average pressure at the end of the cylinder on the aspect ratio for the values ​​of the magnetostriction parameter α: – 0.1 (1), 0 (2), 0.1 (3), 0.2 (4); magnetic susceptibility χ0 = 3.8.

Жүктеу (75KB)

© Russian Academy of Sciences, 2024