On Polymer Complexes of Gold(I) with Glutathione in Aqueous Solution

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅或者付费存取

详细

Processes involving gold(I) glutathionate complexes in aqueous solution at t = 25°C and I = 0.2 M (NaCl) in the pH range 7.20–6.06 (CAu = (5–10 × 10–4 M)) were studied. Using mass spectrometry, it was shown that at CGS > CAu, in addition to monomeric Au(GS)2*, there can exist polymeric forms Au4(GS)4*, as well as Aun(GS)n+1*, where n ≤ 4, the symbol * means the sum of forms of different degrees of protonation. From UV spectroscopy it follows that in the entire region of 0.5 < CGS/CAu < 3, spectra of four forms, including Au(GS)2*, are sufficient to describe all spectra within experimental errors in the form of a linear combination. As pH decreases, the proportion of Au(GS)2* decreases. The equilibrium constant 0.25 Au4(GSH)44– + GSH2– = Au(GSH)23– + H+ is equal to lgK = –4.4 ± 0.1 (I = 0.2 M, NaCl).

全文:

受限制的访问

作者简介

I. Mironov

Nikolaev Institute of Inorganic Chemistry of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: imir@niic.nsc.ru
俄罗斯联邦, Novosibirsk, 630090

V. Kharlamova

Nikolaev Institute of Inorganic Chemistry of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: imir@niic.nsc.ru
俄罗斯联邦, Novosibirsk, 630090

参考

  1. Shaw III C.F. // Chem. Rev. 1999. V. 99. P. 2589. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr980431o
  2. Singh N., Sharma R., Bharti R. // Mater. Today: Proc. 2023. V. 81. P. 876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.04.270
  3. Darabi F., Marzo T., Massai L. et al. // J. Inorg. Biochem. 2015. V. 149. P. 102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2015.03.013
  4. Vaidya S., Hawila S., Zeyu F. et al. // ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2024. V. 16. P. 22512. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.4c01958
  5. Голованова С.А., Садков А.П., Шестаков А.Ф. // Кинетика и катализ. 2020. Т. 61. № 5. С. 664. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0453881120040097
  6. Zhang Q., Wang J., Meng Z. et al. // Nanomaterials. 2021. V. 11. P. 2258. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11092258
  7. Brinas R.P., Hu M., Qian L. et al. // J.Am. Chem. Soc. 2008. V. 130. P. 975. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja076333e
  8. Luo Z., Yuan X., Yu Y. et al. // J.Am. Chem. Soc. 2012. V. 134. P. 16662. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja306199p
  9. Veselska O., Vaidya S., Das C. et al. // Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2022. V. 61. P. e202117261. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202117261
  10. Ao H., Feng H., Li K. et al. // Sens. Actuators B: Chem. 2018. V. 272. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2018.05.151
  11. Vaidya S., Veselska O., Zhadan A. et al. // Chem. Sci. 2020. V. 11. P. 6815. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0SC02258F
  12. Mironov I.V., Kharlamova V.Yu. // J. Solution Chem. 2020. V. 49. P. 583. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10953-020-00994-0
  13. Mironov I.V., Kharlamova V.Yu. // J. Solution Chem. 2018. V. 47. P. 511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10953-018-0735-y
  14. Block B.P., Bailar J.C. // J.Am. Chem. Soc. 1951. V. 73. P. 4722. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01154a071
  15. Берштейн И.Я., Каминский Ю.Л. Спектрофотометрический анализ в органической химии. Л.: Химия, 1986. 198 с.
  16. Mironov I.V., Tsvelodub L.D. // J. Appl. Spectrosc. 1997. V. 64. P. 470. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02683888
  17. Howell J.A.S. // Polyhedron. 2006. V. 25. P. 2993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poly.2006.05.014
  18. Mironov I.V., Kharlamova V.Yu., Makotchenko E.V. // Biometals. 2024. V. 37. P. 233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10534-023-00545-2
  19. Veselska O., Okhrimenko L., Guillou N. et al. // J. Mater. Chem. С. 2017. V. 5. P. 9843. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7tc03605a
  20. Mironov I.V., Kharlamova V.Yu. // Inorg. Chim. Acta. 2021. V. 525. P. 120500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ica.2021.120500
  21. Wojnowski W., Becker B., Saßmannshausen J. et al. // Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 1994. V. 620. P. 1417. https://doi.org/10.1002/zaac.19946200816
  22. Bonasia P.J., Gindelberger D.E., Arnold J. // Inorg. Chem. 1993. V. 32. P. 5126. https://doi.org/10.1021/ic00075a031
  23. Wiseman M.R., Marsh P.A., Bishop P.T. et al. // J.Am. Chem. Soc. 2000. V. 122. P. 12598. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja0011156
  24. Chui S.S.-Y., Chen R., Che C.-M. // Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006. V. 45. P. 1621. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200503431
  25. Schröter I., Strähle J. // Chem. Ber. 1991. V. 124. P. 2161. https://doi.org/10.1002/cber.19911241003
  26. Lavenn C., Okhrimenko L., Guillou N. et al. // J. Mater. Chem. С. 2015. V. 3. P. 4115. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5tc00119f
  27. Bau R. // J.Am. Chem. Soc. 1998. V. 120. P. 9380. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja9819763
  28. LeBlanc D.J., Smith R.W., Wang Z. et al. // J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. 1997. P. 3263. https://doi.org/10.1039/A700827I
  29. Elder R.C., Jones W.B., Zhao Z. et al. // Met. Based Drugs. 1994. V. 1. P. 363. https://doi.org/10.1155/MBD.1994.363
  30. Mazid M.A., Razi M.T., Sadler P.J. et al. // J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1980. P. 1261. https://doi.org/10.1039/C39800001261
  31. Howard-Lock H.E., LeBlanc D.J., Lock C.J.L. et al. // Chem. Commun. 1996. P. 1391. https://doi.org/10.1039/CC9960001391
  32. Howard-Lock H.E. // Met. Based Drugs. 1999. V. 6. P. 201. https://doi.org/10.1155/MBD.1999.201
  33. Isab A.A., Sadler P.J. // J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1981. P. 1657. https://doi.org/10.1039/DT9810001657
  34. Isab A.A., Ahmad S. // Spectroscopy. 2006. V. 20. P. 109. https://doi.org/10.1155/2006/314052
  35. Mironov I.V., Kharlamova V.Yu. // ChemistrySelect. 2023. V. 8. P. e202301337. https://doi.org/10.1002/slct.202301337
  36. Feng S., Zheng X., Wang D. et al. // J. Phys. Chem. A. 2014. V. 118. P. 8222. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp501015k

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML
下载
2. Appendix
下载 (26KB)
索引源数据
3. Scheme 1

下载 (36KB)
索引源数据
4. Fig. 1. a) UV spectra of solutions for pH 7.20. CAu = (7.0-5.4) × 10-4, CGS = (3.5-13.9) × 10-4 M. X = 0.5 (1), 0.75 (2), 0.84 (3), 0.93 (4), 1.19 (5), 1.36 (6), 1.53 (7), 1.84 (8), 2.13 (9), 2.56 (10). b) dependences of ε* (= A/lCAu) on X (= CGS/CAu) for pH: 7.20 (1), 6.66 (2), 6.36 (3), 6.06 (4).

下载 (336KB)
索引源数据
5. Fig. 2. Spectra of solutions having different pH (6.66, 6.36, 6.06) but the same A330 absorbance at λ = 330 nm. A330 = 0.800 (1), 0.600 (2), 0.400 (3), 0.200 (4). 5 - spectrum of Au(GS)2* (CAu = 5.0 × 10-4 M); l = 1 cm. At λ < 310 nm the difference increases due to different amounts of Au(GS)2*.

下载 (223KB)
索引源数据
6. Fig. 3. Examples of spectra decompositions, pH 7.20. Baseline spectra (CAu (10-4 M), X): 7.0, 0.50 (1); 6.7, 0.84 (2); 6.4, 1.19 (3); 4 - spectrum of Au(GS)2* (5.0 × 10-4 M). Decomposable spectra (icons are calculations): 6.75, 0.75 (5); 6.11, 1.53 (6); 5.79, 2.0 (7). X = CGS/CAu. l = 1 cm.

下载 (209KB)
索引源数据

版权所有 © Russian Academy of Sciences, 2024