Noise-immunity of optimal symbol-by-symbol reception of signals with corrective coding in Galois fields for fading channels

Мұқаба

Дәйексөз келтіру

Толық мәтін

Ашық рұқсат Ашық рұқсат
Рұқсат жабық Рұқсат берілді
Рұқсат жабық Тек жазылушылар үшін

Аннотация

A description of the algorithm for optimal symbol-by-symbol reception of signal structures based on correction coding in non-binary Galois fields is given. The results of modeling this algorithm are given in order to study its noise-immunity for transionospheric channels with fading due to scattering on ionospheric irregularities for a number of digital signals with multi-level phase shift keying in combination with a correction code with a parity check in Galois fields. It is shown that for these channels the use of a symbol-by-symbol reception algorithm provides an energy gain of up to 4.5...24 dB in relation to the reception of signals without coding.

Толық мәтін

Рұқсат жабық

Авторлар туралы

L. Nazarov

Fryazino Branch Kotelnikov Institute of Radioengineering and Electronics RAS

Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: levnaz2018@mail.ru
Ресей, Vvedenskogo Squar., 1 Fryazino, Moscow region, 141190

Әдебиет тізімі

  1. Proakis J.G., Salehi M. Digital communication. Boston: McGraw-Hill, Higher Education, 2001.
  2. Bahl L.R., Cocke J., Jelinek F., Raviv J. // IEEE Trans. 1974. V. IT-20. № 3. P. 284.
  3. Смольянинов В.М., Назаров Л.Е. // РЭ. 1999. Т. 44. № 7. С. 838.
  4. Скляр Б. Цифровая связь. Теоретические основы и практическое применение. М.: ИД «Вильямс», 2003.
  5. Johnson S.J. Iterative Error Correction: Turbo, Low-Density Parity-Check and Repeat-Accumulate Codes. Cambridge: Univ. Press, 2010.
  6. Назаров Л.Е., Головкин И.В. // РЭ. 2010. Т. 55. № 10. С. 1193.
  7. Терешонок М.В., Кленов Н.В., Лобов Е.М. и др. // РЭ. 2022. Т. 67. № 3. С. 294. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0033849422030160.
  8. Назаров Л.Е., Батанов В.В. // РЭ. 2022. Т. 67 № 8. С. 782. https://doi.org/ 10.31857/S0033849422080137.
  9. Ping Li, Chan S., Yeng K.L. // Electronic Lett. 1997. V. 33. № 19. P. 1614.
  10. Steiner F., Bocherer G., Liva G. // IEEE Comm. Lett. 2018. V. 22. № 11. P. 2210.
  11. Lin S.-J. // IEEE Trans. 2018. V. СOM-66. № 8. P. 3235.
  12. Назаров Л.Е. // РЭ. 2023. Т. 68. № 9. С. 873. http://doi.org/ 10.31857/S003384942309019X
  13. Bourduge J., Poulliat C., Gadat B. // 2023 IEEE Int. Symp. on Information Theory (ISIT). Taipei. 25-30 Jun. N.Y.: IEEE, 2023. P. 2517. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISIT54713.2023.10206851.
  14. Назаров Л.Е. // Физ. основы приборостроения. 2022. Т. 11. № 3. С. 44. https://doi.org/10.25210/jfop-2203-044049.
  15. Питерсон У., Уэлдон Э. Коды, исправляющие ошибки. М.: Мир, 1976.
  16. Назаров Л.Е., Шишкин П.В. // РЭ. 2019. Т. 64. № 9. С. 910.
  17. Назаров Л.Е., Шишкин П.В. // Журн. радиоэлектроники. 2018. № 12. http://jre.cplire.ru/jre/dec18/10/text.pdf
  18. Kaipa K. // IEEE Comm. Lett. 2018. V. 22. № 11. P. 2210.
  19. Yeo S., Park I.-C. // IEEE Trans. 2018. V. IT-64. № 7. P. 5170.
  20. Crane R.K. // Proc. IEEE. 1977. V. 65. № 2. P. 180.
  21. Rino C.L. Theory of Scintillation with Applications in Remote Sensing. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 2011.
  22. Ionospheric Propagation Data and Prediction Methods Required for the Design of Satellite Services and Systems. Recommendation ITU-R P.531-11. Geneva: Int. Telecommun. Union (ITU), 2012. 24 p.
  23. Назаров Л.Е., Смирнов В.М. // Журн. Радиоэлектроники 2020. № 11. http://jre.cplire.ru/jre/nov20/7/text.pdf https://doi.org/10.30898/1684-1719.2020.11.7.
  24. Назаров Л.Е., Батанов В.В. // РЭ. 2022. Т. 67. № 11. С. 1133. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0033849422110110
  25. Тихонов В.И. Статистическая радиотехника. М.: Сов. радио, 1966.

Қосымша файлдар

Қосымша файлдар
Әрекет
1. JATS XML
Жүктеу
2. Fig. 1. Error probabilities Pb for FM-4 (curve 1), FM-8 (curve 2), FM-16 (curve 3) signals when propagating through the ABGS channel.

Жүктеу (64KB)
Метадеректер
3. Fig. 2. Error probabilities at reception of the signal design based on FM-4 signals for the channel with fading (parameter S4 = 0.3 (a) and 0.6 (b)): 1 - without coding; 2 - using a correction code in the GF field (22).

Жүктеу (120KB)
Метадеректер
4. Fig. 3. Error probabilities at reception of the signal design based on FM-8 signals for the channel with fading (parameter S4 = 0.3 (a) and 0.6 (b)): 1 - without coding; 2 - using a correction code in the GF field (23).

Жүктеу (118KB)
Метадеректер
5. Fig. 4. Error probabilities at reception of the signal design based on FM-16 signals for the channel with fading (parameter S4 = 0.3 (a) and 0.6 (b)): 1 - without coding; 2 - using a correction code in the GF field (24).

Жүктеу (117KB)
Метадеректер

© Russian Academy of Sciences, 2024