Calibration of Imaging Plates for Detecting Charged Particles

A. O. Khurchiev; Хурчиев А. О.; V. A. Panyushkin; Панюшкин В. А.; A. V. Skoblyakov; Скобляков А. В.; A. V. Kantsyrev; Канцырев А. В.; A. A. Golubev; Голубев А. А.; R. O. Gavrilin; Гаврилин Р. О.; A. V. Bogdanov; Богданов А. В.; E. M. Ladygina; Ладыгина Е. М.; S. A. Vysotskii; Высоцкий С. А.

doi:10.31857/S0032816223050294

Calibration of Imaging Plates for Detecting Charged Particles

Authors: Khurchiev A.O.¹, Panyushkin V.A.¹, Skoblyakov A.V.¹, Kantsyrev A.V.¹, Golubev A.A.¹, Gavrilin R.O.¹, Bogdanov A.V.¹, Ladygina E.M.¹, Vysotskii S.A.¹
Affiliations:
1. National Research Center Kurchatov Institute
Issue: No 6 (2023)
Pages: 46-55
Section: ОБЩАЯ ЭКСПЕРИМЕНТАЛЬНАЯ ТЕХНИКА
URL: https://cijournal.ru/0032-8162/article/view/670308
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S0032816223050294
EDN: https://elibrary.ru/LGGDJN
ID: 670308

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access
Restricted Access

Access granted
Restricted Access

Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Information about charged particles emitted by plasma of high-current discharges is of interest both from the point of view of understanding the fundamental processes occurring in pulsed plasma and for applied problems. Compact magnetic spectrometers based on permanent magnets make it possible to measure the flux of charged particles from a plasma under conditions of strong electromagnetic noise. Imaging plates (IP) are one of the most commonly used types of detectors for detecting charged particles in laser-plasma and electric-discharge experiments. This paper presents the results of calibration of the BAS-MS IP when detecting electrons and the BAS-TR IP when detecting helium and tungsten ions. Calibration dependences of the sensitivity of the BAS-MS IP for electrons in the energy range of 0.65–50 MeV and the sensitivity of the BAS-TR IP for tungsten ions in the energy range from 20 eV to 650 keV are obtained, taking into account the angles of incidence of particles on the detector.

References

Miyahara J., Takahashi K., Amemiya Y., Kamiya N., Satow Y. // Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A. 1986. V. 246. P. 572. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-9002(86)90156-7
Amemiya Y., Miyahara J. // Nature. 1988. V. 336. P. 89. https://doi.org/10.1038/336089a0
Tanaka K.A., Yabuuchi T., Sato T., Kodama R., Kitagawa Y., Takahashi T., Ikeda T., Honda Y., Okuda S. // Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2005. V. 76. P. 013507. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1824371
Boutoux G., Rabhi N., Batani D., Binet A., Ducret J.E., Jakubowska K., Nègre J.P., Reverdin C., Thfoin I. // Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2015. V. 86. P. 113304. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4936141
Singh S., Slavicek T., Hodak R., Versaci R., Pridal P., Kumar D. // Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2017. V. 88. P. 075105. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4993921
Bonnet T., Comet M., Denis-Petit D., Gobet F., Hannachi F., Tarisien M., Versteegen M., Aléonard M. // Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2013. V. 84. P. 103510. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4826084
Bonnet T., Comet M., Denis-Petit D., Gobet F., Hannachi F., Tarisien M., Versteegen M., Aléonard M. // Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2013. V. 84. P. 013508. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4775719
Freeman C.G., Fiksel G., Stoeckl C., Sinenian N., Canfield M.J., Graeper G.B., Lombardo A.T., Stillman C.R., Padalino S.J., Mileham C., Sangster T.C., Frenje J.A. // Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2011. V. 82. P. 073301. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3606446
Doria D., Kar S., Ahmed H., Alejo A., Fernandez J., Cerchez M., Gray R.J., Hanton F., MacLellan D.A., McKenna P., Najmudin Z., Neely D., Romagnani L., Ruiz J.A., Sarri G., Scullion C., Streeter M., Swantusch M., Willi O., Zepf M., Borghesi M. // Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2015. V. 86. P. 123302. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4935582
Kojima S., Miyatake T., Inoue S., Dinh T.H., Hasegawa N., Mori M., Sakaki H., Nishiuchi M., Dover N.P., Yamamoto Y., Sasaki T., Ito F., Kondo K., Yamanaka T., Hashida M., Sakabe S., Nishikino M., Kondo K. // Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2021. V. 92. P. 033306. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0035618
Won J., Song J., Palaniyappan S., Gautier D.C., Jeong W., Fernández J.C., Bang W. // Appl. Sci. 2021. V. 11. P. 820. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11020820
Strehlow J., Forestier-Colleoni P., McGuffey C., Bailly-Grandvaux M., Daykin T.S., McCary E., Peebles J., Revet G., Zhang S., Ditmire T., Donovan M., Dyer G., Fuchs J., Gaul E.W., Higginson D.P. et al. // Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2019. V. 90. P. 083302. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5109783
Nishiuchi M., Sakaki H., Dover N.P., Miyahara T., Shiokawa K., Manabe S., Miyatake T., Kondo Ko., Kondo Ke., Iwata Y., Watanabe Y., Kondo Ki. // Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2020. V. 91.P. 093305. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0016515
Zeil K., Kraft S.D., Jochmann A., Kroll F., Jahr W., Schramm U., Karsch L., Pawelke J., Hidding B., Pretzler G. // Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2010. V. 81. P. 013307. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3284524
Ingenito F., Andreoli P., Batani D., Boutoux G., Cipriani M., Consoli F., Cristofari G., Curcio A., De Angelis R., Di Giorgio G., Ducret J., Forestier-Colleoni P., Hulin S., Jakubowska K., Rabhi N. // JINST. 2016. V. 11(5). P. C05012. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/11/05/C05012
https://www.duerrdental.com/en/products/imaging/intraoral-diagnostics/vistascan-mini-view/
Nave G., Sansonetti C.J., Szabo C.I., Curry J.J., Smil-lie D.G. // Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2011. V. 82. P. 013107. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3529879
Lelasseux V., Fuchs J. // JINST. 2020. V. 15. P. 004002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/15/04/P04002
http://www.srim.org/
http://geant4-userdoc.web.cern.ch/geant4-userdoc/UsersGuides/ForApplicationDeveloper/fo/BookForApplicationDevelopers.pdf
Chen H., Back N.L., Bartal T., Beg F.N., Eder D.C., link A. J., MacPhee A.G., Ping Y., Song P.M., Throop A., Van Woerkom L. // Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2008. V. 79. P. 033301. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2885045